When to Bring in Investigative Discovery Support, and When Not To
- Laura Schneider
- Feb 9
- 1 min read
Why selectivity matters.
Investigative discovery support is not a universal solution. Its value depends on context, complexity, and objectives. Understanding when it adds value, and when it does not, is essential to making informed decisions.
When Support Adds Value
Support is most effective in cases involving overlapping timelines, multiple parties, inconsistent records, or discovery that must be analyzed across sources. In these matters, structure and insight are critical to maintaining control.
When It Doesn’t
Cases with limited scope, straightforward issues, or discovery that aligns cleanly with linear workflows may not require additional support. Automated tools or in-house review may be sufficient.
The Importance of Selectivity
The Wildproof Approach is intentionally selective. Engagements are structured to support legal judgment, not replace it. This selectivity ensures focus, accuracy, and reliability.
If your case requires more than organization, and less than chaos, investigative discovery support may be appropriate.
Comments